Repocop reports by srpm

  rpm id test status message
blender-4.2.1-alt1.1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
blender-4.2.1-alt1.1.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop info desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/blender.desktop: warning: key "X-KDE-RunOnDiscreteGpu" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated
blender-cycles-hip-kernels-4.2.1-alt1.1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share info The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
blender-cycles-nvidia-kernels-4.2.1-alt1.1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share info The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
blender-doc-4.2.1-alt1.1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share info The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.

generated by repocop at Sat Nov 9 02:24:06 2024