| |
packager |
rpm id |
test |
status |
message |
 |
antohami |
IMSProg-1.8.5-alt1.x86_64 |
freedesktop-desktop |
warn |
desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/IMSProg_editor.desktop: error: file contains multiple keys named "Comment" in group "Desktop Entry"
/usr/share/applications/IMSProg_editor.desktop: warning: value "Chip database editor for IMSProg" for key "Comment[en]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[en]"
/usr/share/applications/IMSProg_editor.desktop: warning: value "???????? ???? ????????? ??? IMSProg" for key "Comment[ru]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[ru]"
/usr/share/applications/IMSProg_editor.desktop: warning: value "Editor de bases de datos de chips para IMSProg" for key "Comment[es]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[es]"
/usr/share/applications/IMSProg_editor.desktop: warning: value "Chipdatenbank-Editor f?r IMSProg" for key "Comment[de]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[de]"
/usr/share/applications/IMSProg_editor.desktop: warning: value "???????? ???? ????????? ??? IMSProg" for key "Comment[uk]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[uk]"
/usr/share/applications/IMSProg_editor.desktop: warning: value "Editor do banco de dados de chips para IMSProg" for key "Comment[pt]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[pt]"
/usr/share/applications/IMSProg_editor.desktop: warning: value "Chipszerkeszt? adatb?zis az IMSProg sz?m?ra" for key "Comment[hu]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[hu]"
/usr/share/applications/IMSProg_editor.desktop: warning: value "Editor del database dei chip per IMSProg" for key "Comment[it]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[it]"
/usr/share/applications/IMSProg_editor.desktop: warning: value "IMSProg ????????" for key "Comment[zh]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[zh]"
/usr/share/applications/IMSProg_editor.desktop: warning: value "IMSProg ????????" for key "Comment[zh_TW]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[zh_TW]" |
 |
antohami |
IMSProg-1.8.5-alt1.x86_64 |
iconsdir |
experimental |
Please, move pixmaps from /usr/share/pixmaps to %_liconsdir, %_niconsdir, %_miconsdir according to their size. See http://www.altlinux.org/IconPathsPolicy. |
 |
antohami |
IMSProg-1.8.5-alt1.x86_64 |
sisyphus_check |
fail |
sisyphus_check failed: /ALT/Sisyphus/files/x86_64/RPMS/IMSProg-1.8.5-alt1.x86_64.rpm: invalid udev rules path: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/71-CH341.rules sisyphus_check: check-udev ERROR: udev rules path violation |
|
antohami |
cura-5.13.0-alt3.noarch |
freedesktop-categories |
warn |
Menu-related Additional Categories (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) not found in /usr/share/applications/com.ultimaker.cura.desktop. Please add it or report a bug against this test if you already have registered one (not including menu unrelated ones as Core or Qt). |
 |
antohami |
gnuradio-3.10.12.0-alt2.x86_64 |
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share |
info |
The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere. |
|
antohami |
gnuradio-3.10.12.0-alt2.x86_64 |
freedesktop-desktop |
info |
desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/gnuradio-grc.desktop: hint: value item "HamRadio" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" can be extended with another category among the following categories: Network, or Audio
/usr/share/applications/gnuradio-grc.desktop: hint: value "Development;HamRadio;Science;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains more than one main category; application might appear more than once in the application menu |
|
antohami |
gnuradio-libs-3.10.12.0-alt2.x86_64 |
library-pkgnames |
info |
package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs |
|
antohami |
guitarix-0.47.0-alt2.x86_64 |
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share |
info |
The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere. |
|
antohami |
guitarix-0.47.0-alt2.x86_64 |
iconsdir |
experimental |
Please, move pixmaps from /usr/share/pixmaps to %_liconsdir, %_niconsdir, %_miconsdir according to their size. See http://www.altlinux.org/IconPathsPolicy. |
|
antohami |
kicad-10.0.4-alt1.x86_64 |
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so |
info |
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libkigal.so but just /usr/lib64/libkigal.so.10.0.4. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libkigal.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libkigal.so to \%files of kicad-10.0.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
pocop test.
test. |
|
antohami |
kicad-10.0.4-alt1.x86_64 |
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share |
info |
The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere. |
|
antohami |
kicad-10.0.4-alt1.x86_64 |
bin-permissions |
info |
not executable file /usr/bin/_pl_editor.kiface
face |
|
antohami |
uhd-4.10.0.0-alt2.x86_64 |
sisyphus_check |
fail |
sisyphus_check failed: /ALT/Sisyphus/files/x86_64/RPMS/uhd-4.10.0.0-alt2.x86_64.rpm: invalid udev rules path: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/10-usrp-uhd.rules sisyphus_check: check-udev ERROR: udev rules path violation |
|
romenskiy |
PrusaSlicer-2.9.6-alt2.x86_64 |
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share |
info |
The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere. |
|
romenskiy |
SuperSlicer-2.7.61.10-alt6.x86_64 |
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share |
info |
The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere. |