libnix-2.35.1-alt1.x86_64	altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so	info	SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnixutilc.so but just /usr/lib64/libnixutilc.so.2.35.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnixutilc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib<name>-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib<name>-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnixutilc.so to \%files of libnix-2.35.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib<name>-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.; st.; pocop test.; 
nix-2.35.1-alt1.x86_64	sisyphus_check	fail	sisyphus_check failed:  /ALT/Sisyphus/files/x86_64/RPMS/nix-2.35.1-alt1.x86_64.rpm: Invalid path names: /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/nix-daemon.conf sisyphus_check: check-fhs ERROR: FHS violation; 
nix-2.35.1-alt1.x86_64	systemd-but-no-native-init	experimental	The package have native systemd file(s) but no  SysV init scripts.
nix-doc-2.35.1-alt1.x86_64	arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share	info	The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
