Repocop reports by test

  status rpm id message
info ElectricFence-2.2.2-alt3.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libefence.so but just /usr/lib64/libefence.so.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libefence.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libefence.so to \%files of ElectricFence-2.2.2-alt3.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info alsa-oss-1.1.8-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libalsatoss.so but just /usr/lib64/libalsatoss.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libalsatoss.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libalsatoss.so to \%files of alsa-oss-1.1.8-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libaoss.so but just /usr/lib64/libaoss.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libaoss.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libaoss.so to \%files of alsa-oss-1.1.8-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info ananas-0.9.5-alt11.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libananas.so but just /usr/lib64/libananas.so.1.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libananas.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libananas.so to \%files of ananas-0.9.5-alt11.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info aufs3-util-3.0-alt0.1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libau.so but just /usr/lib64/libau.so.2.6. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libau.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libau.so to \%files of aufs3-util-3.0-alt0.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info capstone-4.0.2-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so but just /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so.4. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcapstone.so to \%files of capstone-4.0.2-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info ceph-base-14.2.10-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libos_tp.so but just /usr/lib64/libos_tp.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libos_tp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libos_tp.so to \%files of ceph-base-14.2.10-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libosd_tp.so but just /usr/lib64/libosd_tp.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libosd_tp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libosd_tp.so to \%files of ceph-base-14.2.10-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info cgreen-1.0-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcgreen.so but just /usr/lib64/libcgreen.so.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcgreen.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcgreen.so to \%files of cgreen-1.0-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info codeblocks-contrib-20.03-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libwxsmithlib.so but just /usr/lib64/libwxsmithlib.so.0.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libwxsmithlib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libwxsmithlib.so to \%files of codeblocks-contrib-20.03-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libccom.so but just /usr/lib64/libccom.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libccom.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libccom.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libced.so but just /usr/lib64/libced.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libced.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libced.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcfcompat.so but just /usr/lib64/libcfcompat.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcfcompat.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcfcompat.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcfio.so but just /usr/lib64/libcfio.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcfio.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcfio.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcimage.so but just /usr/lib64/libcimage.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcimage.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcimage.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcline.so but just /usr/lib64/libcline.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcline.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcline.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcpage.so but just /usr/lib64/libcpage.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcpage.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcpage.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcpu32.so but just /usr/lib64/libcpu32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcpu32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcpu32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcstr.so but just /usr/lib64/libcstr.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcstr.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcstr.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libctb32.so but just /usr/lib64/libctb32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libctb32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libctb32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libcuneiform.so but just /usr/lib64/libcuneiform.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libcuneiform.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libcuneiform.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libdif32.so but just /usr/lib64/libdif32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libdif32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libdif32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libevn32.so but just /usr/lib64/libevn32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libevn32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libevn32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libexc.so but just /usr/lib64/libexc.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libexc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libexc.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libfon32.so but just /usr/lib64/libfon32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libfon32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libfon32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libleo32.so but just /usr/lib64/libleo32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libleo32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libleo32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/liblns32.so but just /usr/lib64/liblns32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/liblns32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/liblns32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libloc32.so but just /usr/lib64/libloc32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libloc32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libloc32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmmx32.so but just /usr/lib64/libmmx32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmmx32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmmx32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmsk32.so but just /usr/lib64/libmsk32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmsk32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmsk32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpass2.so but just /usr/lib64/libpass2.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpass2.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpass2.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr3532.so but just /usr/lib64/libr3532.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr3532.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr3532.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librbal.so but just /usr/lib64/librbal.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librbal.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librbal.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librblock.so but just /usr/lib64/librblock.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librblock.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librblock.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librcorrkegl.so but just /usr/lib64/librcorrkegl.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librcorrkegl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librcorrkegl.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librcutp.so but just /usr/lib64/librcutp.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librcutp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librcutp.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librdib.so but just /usr/lib64/librdib.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librdib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librdib.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librfrmt.so but just /usr/lib64/librfrmt.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librfrmt.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librfrmt.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librimage.so but just /usr/lib64/librimage.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librimage.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librimage.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librline.so but just /usr/lib64/librline.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librline.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librline.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librling.so but just /usr/lib64/librling.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librling.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librling.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librlings.so but just /usr/lib64/librlings.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librlings.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librlings.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librmarker.so but just /usr/lib64/librmarker.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librmarker.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librmarker.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librneg.so but just /usr/lib64/librneg.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librneg.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librneg.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librout.so but just /usr/lib64/librout.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librout.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librout.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librpic.so but just /usr/lib64/librpic.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librpic.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librpic.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librpstr.so but just /usr/lib64/librpstr.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librpstr.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librpstr.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librreccom.so but just /usr/lib64/librreccom.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librreccom.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librreccom.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librsadd.so but just /usr/lib64/librsadd.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librsadd.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librsadd.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librselstr.so but just /usr/lib64/librselstr.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librselstr.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librselstr.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librshelllines.so but just /usr/lib64/librshelllines.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librshelllines.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librshelllines.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librstr.so but just /usr/lib64/librstr.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librstr.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librstr.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librstuff.so but just /usr/lib64/librstuff.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librstuff.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librstuff.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librverline.so but just /usr/lib64/librverline.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librverline.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librverline.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsmetric.so but just /usr/lib64/libsmetric.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsmetric.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsmetric.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstd32.so but just /usr/lib64/libstd32.so.1.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstd32.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstd32.so to \%files of cuneiform-1.1.0-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info dante-1.4.2-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsocks.so but just /usr/lib64/libsocks.so.0.1.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsocks.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsocks.so to \%files of dante-1.4.2-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info dmd-2.091.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libphobos2.so but just /usr/lib64/libphobos2.so.0.91.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libphobos2.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libphobos2.so to \%files of dmd-2.091.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.7.7-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libescpr.so but just /usr/lib64/libescpr.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libescpr.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libescpr.so to \%files of epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.7.7-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info geany-plugins-1.36-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libgeanypluginutils.so but just /usr/lib64/libgeanypluginutils.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libgeanypluginutils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libgeanypluginutils.so to \%files of geany-plugins-1.36-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info gettext-tools-0.20.2-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libgettextpo.so but just /usr/lib64/libgettextpo.so.0.5.6. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libgettextpo.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libgettextpo.so to \%files of gettext-tools-0.20.2-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so but just /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so.3.0.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.so to \%files of guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.so but just /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.so.3.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-3.so to \%files of guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.so but just /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.so.3.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-3.so to \%files of guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.so but just /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.so.2.0.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.so to \%files of guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libguilereadline-v-17.so but just /usr/lib64/libguilereadline-v-17.so.17.0.3. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libguilereadline-v-17.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libguilereadline-v-17.so to \%files of guile18-1.8.7-alt8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info hedgewars-1.0.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libavwrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libavwrapper.so.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libavwrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libavwrapper.so to \%files of hedgewars-1.0.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libphyslayer.so but just /usr/lib64/libphyslayer.so.1.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libphyslayer.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libphyslayer.so to \%files of hedgewars-1.0.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info igt-gpu-tools-1.24-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libigt.so but just /usr/lib64/libigt.so.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libigt.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libigt.so to \%files of igt-gpu-tools-1.24-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info jpcap-0.7-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libjpcap.so but just /usr/lib64/libjpcap.so.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libjpcap.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libjpcap.so to \%files of jpcap-0.7-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info juffed-0.10-alt3.git7746772.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libjuff.so but just /usr/lib64/libjuff.so.0.10. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libjuff.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libjuff.so to \%files of juffed-0.10-alt3.git7746772.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libjuffed-engine-qsci.so but just /usr/lib64/libjuffed-engine-qsci.so.0.10. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libjuffed-engine-qsci.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libjuffed-engine-qsci.so to \%files of juffed-0.10-alt3.git7746772.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info kicad-5.1.6-alt1.rc1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libkicad_3dsg.so but just /usr/lib64/libkicad_3dsg.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libkicad_3dsg.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libkicad_3dsg.so to \%files of kicad-5.1.6-alt1.rc1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info last.fm-1.5.1.31879-alt4.1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libLastFmTools.so but just /usr/lib64/libLastFmTools.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libLastFmTools.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libLastFmTools.so to \%files of last.fm-1.5.1.31879-alt4.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libMoose.so but just /usr/lib64/libMoose.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libMoose.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libMoose.so to \%files of last.fm-1.5.1.31879-alt4.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info lftp-4.8.4-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/liblftp-jobs.so but just /usr/lib64/liblftp-jobs.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/liblftp-jobs.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/liblftp-jobs.so to \%files of lftp-4.8.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/liblftp-tasks.so but just /usr/lib64/liblftp-tasks.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/liblftp-tasks.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/liblftp-tasks.so to \%files of lftp-4.8.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libbcc-0.15.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libbcc.so but just /usr/lib64/libbcc.so.0.15.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libbcc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libbcc.so to \%files of libbcc-0.15.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libbcc_bpf.so but just /usr/lib64/libbcc_bpf.so.0.15.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libbcc_bpf.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libbcc_bpf.so to \%files of libbcc-0.15.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libbcg729-1.0.4-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libbcg729.so but just /usr/lib64/libbcg729.so.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libbcg729.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libbcg729.so to \%files of libbcg729-1.0.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libdevmapper-event-1.02.171-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libdevmapper-event-lvm2.so but just /usr/lib64/libdevmapper-event-lvm2.so.2.03. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libdevmapper-event-lvm2.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libdevmapper-event-lvm2.so to \%files of libdevmapper-event-1.02.171-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libgpac-v0.7.1.0.284.gite64a7d229-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libgpac.so but just /usr/lib64/libgpac.so.7.6.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libgpac.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libgpac.so to \%files of libgpac-v0.7.1.0.284.gite64a7d229-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libjemalloc-devel-5.2.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libjemalloc_profiler.so but just /usr/lib64/libjemalloc_profiler.so.2.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libjemalloc_profiler.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libjemalloc_profiler.so to \%files of libjemalloc-devel-5.2.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libjsw-1.5.6-alt1.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libjsw.so but just /usr/lib64/libjsw.so.1.5.6. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libjsw.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libjsw.so to \%files of libjsw-1.5.6-alt1.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libmp3splt-0.9.2-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_flac.so but just /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_flac.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_flac.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_flac.so to \%files of libmp3splt-0.9.2-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_mp3.so but just /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_mp3.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_mp3.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_mp3.so to \%files of libmp3splt-0.9.2-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_ogg.so but just /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_ogg.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_ogg.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmp3splt0/libsplt_ogg.so to \%files of libmp3splt-0.9.2-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libmpack-1.0.5-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmpack.so but just /usr/lib64/libmpack.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmpack.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmpack.so to \%files of libmpack-1.0.5-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libpcsclite-1.9.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpcsclite.so but just /usr/lib64/libpcsclite.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpcsclite.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpcsclite.so to \%files of libpcsclite-1.9.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libpcsclite-devel-1.9.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpcscspy.so but just /usr/lib64/libpcscspy.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpcscspy.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpcscspy.so to \%files of libpcsclite-devel-1.9.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libpdflib-lite-7.0.5-alt1.p3.1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpdf.so but just /usr/lib64/libpdf.so.6.0.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpdf.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpdf.so to \%files of libpdflib-lite-7.0.5-alt1.p3.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_exim.so but just /usr/lib64/libpfq_exim.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_exim.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpfq_exim.so to \%files of libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix1.so but just /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix1.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix1.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix1.so to \%files of libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix2.so but just /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix2.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix2.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpfq_postfix2.so to \%files of libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_socket.so but just /usr/lib64/libpfq_socket.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpfq_socket.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpfq_socket.so to \%files of libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpfqueue.so but just /usr/lib64/libpfqueue.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpfqueue.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpfqueue.so to \%files of libpfq-0.5.6-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libpolyml-5.4.1-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpolyml.so but just /usr/lib64/libpolyml.so.3.0.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpolyml.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpolyml.so to \%files of libpolyml-5.4.1-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libral-0.96-alt0.1.qa3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libcsv.so but just /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libcsv.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libcsv.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libcsv.so to \%files of libral-0.96-alt0.1.qa3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/librubrica.so but just /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/librubrica.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/librubrica.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/librubrica.so to \%files of libral-0.96-alt0.1.qa3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libvcard.so but just /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libvcard.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libvcard.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libral/plugins/libvcard.so to \%files of libral-0.96-alt0.1.qa3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info librdkafka-1.4.4-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librdkafka++.so but just /usr/lib64/librdkafka++.so.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librdkafka++.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librdkafka++.so to \%files of librdkafka-1.4.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/librdkafka.so but just /usr/lib64/librdkafka.so.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/librdkafka.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/librdkafka.so to \%files of librdkafka-1.4.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libstlink-2018.04.18-alt2.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstlink.so but just /usr/lib64/libstlink.so.1.5.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstlink.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstlink.so to \%files of libstlink-2018.04.18-alt2.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libta-lib-0.4.0-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libta_lib.so but just /usr/lib64/libta_lib.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libta_lib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libta_lib.so to \%files of libta-lib-0.4.0-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libtag-extras-1.0.1-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libtag-extras.so but just /usr/lib64/libtag-extras.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libtag-extras.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libtag-extras.so to \%files of libtag-extras-1.0.1-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libtranslit-icu-0.0.3-alt1_23.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtransliticu.so but just /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtransliticu.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtransliticu.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtransliticu.so to \%files of libtranslit-icu-0.0.3-alt1_23.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libtranslit-m17n-0.0.3-alt1_23.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtranslitm17n.so but just /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtranslitm17n.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtranslitm17n.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libtranslit/modules/libtranslitm17n.so to \%files of libtranslit-m17n-0.0.3-alt1_23.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libuniset2-extension-mysql-2.8-alt14.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libUniSet2-mysql.so but just /usr/lib64/libUniSet2-mysql.so.2.0.8. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libUniSet2-mysql.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libUniSet2-mysql.so to \%files of libuniset2-extension-mysql-2.8-alt14.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libunixODBC2-2.3.7-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcmyS.so but just /usr/lib64/libodbcmyS.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcmyS.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libodbcmyS.so to \%files of libunixODBC2-2.3.7-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcpsql.so but just /usr/lib64/libodbcpsql.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcpsql.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libodbcpsql.so to \%files of libunixODBC2-2.3.7-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcpsqlS.so but just /usr/lib64/libodbcpsqlS.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libodbcpsqlS.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libodbcpsqlS.so to \%files of libunixODBC2-2.3.7-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libxmlsec1-gcrypt-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gcrypt.so but just /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gcrypt.so.1.2.28. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gcrypt.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gcrypt.so to \%files of libxmlsec1-gcrypt-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libxmlsec1-gnutls-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gnutls.so but just /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gnutls.so.1.2.28. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gnutls.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-gnutls.so to \%files of libxmlsec1-gnutls-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libxmlsec1-nss-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-nss.so but just /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-nss.so.1.2.28. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-nss.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-nss.so to \%files of libxmlsec1-nss-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info libxmlsec1-openssl-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-openssl.so but just /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-openssl.so.1.2.28. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-openssl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libxmlsec1-openssl.so to \%files of libxmlsec1-openssl-1.2.28-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info lldpd-1.0.4-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/liblldpctl.so but just /usr/lib64/liblldpctl.so.4.8.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/liblldpctl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/liblldpctl.so to \%files of lldpd-1.0.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info midori-9.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmidori-core.so but just /usr/lib64/libmidori-core.so.0.6. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmidori-core.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmidori-core.so to \%files of midori-9.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so but just /usr/lib64/libmapi.so.9.0.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmapi.so to \%files of monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstream.so but just /usr/lib64/libstream.so.8.2.3. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstream.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstream.so to \%files of monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libbat.so but just /usr/lib64/libbat.so.15.0.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libbat.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libbat.so to \%files of monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so but just /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so.23.0.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so to \%files of monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info mono-core-5.20.1.19-alt5.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-native.so but just /usr/lib64/libmono-native.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-native.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmono-native.so to \%files of mono-core-5.20.1.19-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-aot.so but just /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-aot.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-aot.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-aot.so to \%files of mono-core-5.20.1.19-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-coverage.so but just /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-coverage.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-coverage.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-coverage.so to \%files of mono-core-5.20.1.19-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-log.so but just /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-log.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-log.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmono-profiler-log.so to \%files of mono-core-5.20.1.19-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmonoboehm-2.0.so but just /usr/lib64/libmonoboehm-2.0.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmonoboehm-2.0.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmonoboehm-2.0.so to \%files of mono-core-5.20.1.19-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmonosgen-2.0.so but just /usr/lib64/libmonosgen-2.0.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmonosgen-2.0.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmonosgen-2.0.so to \%files of mono-core-5.20.1.19-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info mozldap-6.0.7-alt5.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libldap60.so but just /usr/lib64/libldap60.so.6.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libldap60.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libldap60.so to \%files of mozldap-6.0.7-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libldif60.so but just /usr/lib64/libldif60.so.6.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libldif60.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libldif60.so to \%files of mozldap-6.0.7-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so but just /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so.6.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so to \%files of mozldap-6.0.7-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libssldap60.so but just /usr/lib64/libssldap60.so.6.0.7. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libssldap60.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libssldap60.so to \%files of mozldap-6.0.7-alt5.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info mumble-1.3.1-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmumble.so but just /usr/lib64/libmumble.so.1.3.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmumble.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmumble.so to \%files of mumble-1.3.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info netxms-agent-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libappagent.so but just /usr/lib64/libappagent.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libappagent.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libappagent.so to \%files of netxms-agent-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so to \%files of netxms-agent-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info netxms-client-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so to \%files of netxms-client-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so but just /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so.4.6.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so.5.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so but just /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.2.11-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info nextcloud-client-2.6.4-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnextcloudsync.so but just /usr/lib64/libnextcloudsync.so.2.6.4. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnextcloudsync.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnextcloudsync.so to \%files of nextcloud-client-2.6.4-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info nss_wrapper-1.1.5-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_wrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libnss_wrapper.so.0.2.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_wrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnss_wrapper.so to \%files of nss_wrapper-1.1.5-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info pmplib-0.14-alt0.1.qa2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpmp.so but just /usr/lib64/libpmp.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpmp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpmp.so to \%files of pmplib-0.14-alt0.1.qa2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info procbench-0.9.0a-alt4.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpbbench.so but just /usr/lib64/libpbbench.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpbbench.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpbbench.so to \%files of procbench-0.9.0a-alt4.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info proxychains-3.1-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libproxychains.so but just /usr/lib64/libproxychains.so.3.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libproxychains.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libproxychains.so to \%files of proxychains-3.1-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_anal.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_asm.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_bin.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_bin.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_bin.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_bin.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_bp.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_bp.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_bp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_bp.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_config.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_config.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_config.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_config.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_cons.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_cons.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_cons.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_cons.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_core.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_core.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_core.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_core.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_crypto.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_crypto.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_crypto.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_crypto.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_debug.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_debug.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_debug.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_debug.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_egg.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_egg.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_egg.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_egg.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_flag.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_flag.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_flag.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_flag.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_fs.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_fs.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_fs.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_fs.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_hash.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_hash.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_hash.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_hash.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_io.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_io.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_io.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_io.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_lang.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_lang.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_lang.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_lang.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_magic.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_magic.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_magic.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_magic.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_main.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_main.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_main.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_main.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_parse.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_parse.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_parse.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_parse.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_reg.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_reg.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_reg.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_reg.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_search.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_search.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_search.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_search.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_socket.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_socket.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_socket.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_socket.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_syscall.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_syscall.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_syscall.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_syscall.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libr_util.so but just /usr/lib64/libr_util.so.4.4.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libr_util.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libr_util.so to \%files of radare2-4.4.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info rust-1.42.0-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libLLVM-9-rust-1.42.0-stable.so but just /usr/lib64/libLLVM-9-rust-1.42.0-stable.so.old. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libLLVM-9-rust-1.42.0-stable.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libLLVM-9-rust-1.42.0-stable.so to \%files of rust-1.42.0-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info samba-winbind-clients-4.11.9-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_winbind.so but just /usr/lib64/libnss_winbind.so.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_winbind.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnss_winbind.so to \%files of samba-winbind-clients-4.11.9-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_wins.so but just /usr/lib64/libnss_wins.so.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnss_wins.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnss_wins.so to \%files of samba-winbind-clients-4.11.9-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info smack-utils-1.3.1-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsmack.so but just /usr/lib64/libsmack.so.1.3.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsmack.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsmack.so to \%files of smack-utils-1.3.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info socket_wrapper-1.2.1-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper.so.0.1.11. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsocket_wrapper.so to \%files of socket_wrapper-1.2.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info subversion-javahl-1.14.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libsvnjavahl-1.so but just /usr/lib64/libsvnjavahl-1.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libsvnjavahl-1.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libsvnjavahl-1.so to \%files of subversion-javahl-1.14.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info svox-pico-20120212-alt2.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libttspico.so but just /usr/lib64/libttspico.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libttspico.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libttspico.so to \%files of svox-pico-20120212-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info thrift-glib-0.10.0-alt7_15jpp8.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so but just /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libthrift_c_glib.so to \%files of thrift-glib-0.10.0-alt7_15jpp8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libthriftc.so but just /usr/lib64/libthriftc.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libthriftc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libthriftc.so to \%files of thrift-glib-0.10.0-alt7_15jpp8.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info tiled-1.4.1-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libtiled.so but just /usr/lib64/libtiled.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libtiled.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libtiled.so to \%files of tiled-1.4.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info tsocks-1.8-alt1.qa1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libtsocks.so but just /usr/lib64/libtsocks.so.1.8. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libtsocks.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libtsocks.so to \%files of tsocks-1.8-alt1.qa1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info uid_wrapper-1.2.4-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libuid_wrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libuid_wrapper.so.0.0.6. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libuid_wrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libuid_wrapper.so to \%files of uid_wrapper-1.2.4-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info valentina-0.3.0-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libqmuparser.so but just /usr/lib64/libqmuparser.so.2.2.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libqmuparser.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libqmuparser.so to \%files of valentina-0.3.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libvpropertyexplorer.so but just /usr/lib64/libvpropertyexplorer.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libvpropertyexplorer.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libvpropertyexplorer.so to \%files of valentina-0.3.0-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info verlihub-plugin-python-1.1-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libpython_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libpython_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libpython_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libpython_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugin-python-1.1-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libvh_python_wrapper.so but just /usr/lib64/libvh_python_wrapper.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libvh_python_wrapper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libvh_python_wrapper.so to \%files of verlihub-plugin-python-1.1-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libchatroom_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libchatroom_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libchatroom_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libchatroom_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libforbid_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libforbid_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libforbid_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libforbid_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libiplog_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libiplog_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libiplog_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libiplog_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libisp_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libisp_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libisp_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libisp_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmessanger_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libmessanger_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmessanger_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmessanger_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libreplace_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libreplace_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libreplace_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libreplace_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstats_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/libstats_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstats_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstats_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-0.1-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info verlihub-plugins-lua51-1.8.1-alt1.qa3.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/liblua_pi.so but just /usr/lib64/liblua_pi.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/liblua_pi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/liblua_pi.so to \%files of verlihub-plugins-lua51-1.8.1-alt1.qa3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdAppUtils.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdCl.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdClient.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdClient.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdClient.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdClient.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCrypto.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdCrypto.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCrypto.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdCrypto.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdFfs.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdFfs.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdFfs.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdFfs.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdPosix.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdPosix.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdPosix.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdPosix.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdServer.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdServer.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdServer.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdServer.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdUtils.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdUtils.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdUtils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdUtils.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdXml.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdXml.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdXml.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdXml.so to \%files of xrootd-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdCryptoLite.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdHttpUtils.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdPosixPreload.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdPosixPreload.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdPosixPreload.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdPosixPreload.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiLib.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiLib.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiLib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiLib.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiShMap.so but just /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiShMap.so.1.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiShMap.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libXrdSsiShMap.so to \%files of xrootd-devel-4.9.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
info xsp-4.6-alt1.x86_64 SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libfpm_helper.so but just /usr/lib64/libfpm_helper.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libfpm_helper.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libfpm_helper.so to \%files of xsp-4.6-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.

generated by repocop at Sat Jul 11 04:31:09 2020