Repocop reports by srpm

	rpm id	test	status	message
	gdcm-3.0.24-alt1.x86_64	altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so	info	SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libgdcmmd5.so but just /usr/lib64/libgdcmmd5.so.3.0.24. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libgdcmmd5.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libgdcmmd5.so to \%files of gdcm-3.0.24-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. p test. st.
	gdcm-3.0.24-alt1.x86_64	library-pkgnames	info	package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs
	gdcm-examples-3.0.24-alt1.x86_64	arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share	info	The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.