Repocop reports by srpm

  rpm id test status message
branding-school-lite-5.9.9-alt1.src requires-ImageMagick info Dependency on ImageMagick (compat package) found. It probably should be replaced with more specific dependency like /usr/bin/convert or ImageMagick-tools, or it can be already autodetected by findreq-shell.
branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lxdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-7.0.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-tablet-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-informika-schoolmaster-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt47.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-ivk-chainmail-indexhtml-3.0-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-8.2.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-sisyphus-server-light-indexhtml-1.9.3-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
branding-school-lite-notes-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-notes-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lxdesktop-notes-6.0.0-alt7.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-tablet-notes-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-informika-schoolmaster-notes-6.0.0-alt47.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-sisyphus-server-light-notes-1.9.3-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
branding-school-lite-release-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package altlinux-release-icarus-20160328-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p8-20160414-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-release-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lxdesktop-release-6.0.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-tablet-release-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package branding-informika-schoolmaster-release-6.0.0-alt47.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package branding-sisyphus-server-light-release-1.9.3-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-11888137035.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-office-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/panels.xml /etc/skel/.local/share/applications/defaults.list /usr/share/xfce4/backdrops/xdm.png conflict with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-10.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-network-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-11888137035.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-office-lite-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.

generated by repocop at Tue Aug 21 05:33:59 2018