Repocop reports for by-leader glebfm

  rpm id test status message
alt-gpgkeys-0.8.92-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
alt-gpgkeys-utils-0.8.92-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
alt-rpmkeys-0.8.92-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
alt-rpmkeys-utils-0.8.92-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
altlinux-repos-11.0-alt2.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
apt-conf-branch-11.0-alt1.x86_64 rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package apt-conf-sisyphus-10.96-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of apt-conf-sisyphus-10.96-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
apt-repo-tools-0.8.1-alt1.x86_64 missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
apt-repo-tools-debuginfo-0.8.1-alt1.x86_64 missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
aptitude-0.4.5-alt16.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
aptitude-doc-0.4.5-alt16.x86_64 arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share info The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
arepoize-0.1-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
binutils-2.41-alt1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
binutils-devel-2.41-alt1.x86_64 library-pkgnames-static warn package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library
fb2edit-0.1.0-alt1.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop info desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/fb2edit.desktop: hint: value "Office;FileTools;Qt;Viewer;TextTools;TextEditor;Utility;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains more than one main category; application might appear more than once in the application menu
gcc10-doc-10.5.0-alt1.noarch rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package gcc13-doc-13.2.1-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc13-doc-13.2.1-alt4.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc10-fortran-doc-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64 rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package gcc13-fortran-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc13-fortran-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc10-gdc-doc-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /usr/share/info/gdc.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc13-gdc-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
gcc10-go-doc-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64 rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package gcc13-go-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc13-go-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc11-doc-11.4.1-alt1.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package gcc10-doc-10.5.0-alt1.noarch, but the package gcc10-doc-10.5.0-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc11-doc-11.4.1-alt1.noarch rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package gcc13-doc-13.2.1-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc13-doc-13.2.1-alt4.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc11-fortran-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64 rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package gcc10-fortran-doc-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc10-fortran-doc-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc11-fortran-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64 rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package gcc13-fortran-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc13-fortran-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc11-gdc-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /usr/share/info/gdc.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc13-gdc-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
gcc11-go-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64 rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package gcc10-go-doc-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc10-go-doc-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc11-go-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64 rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package gcc13-go-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc13-go-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc12-doc-12.3.1-alt1.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package gcc11-doc-11.4.1-alt1.noarch, but the package gcc11-doc-11.4.1-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc12-doc-12.3.1-alt1.noarch rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package gcc13-doc-13.2.1-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc13-doc-13.2.1-alt4.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc12-fortran-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package gcc11-fortran-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc11-fortran-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc12-fortran-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package gcc13-fortran-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc13-fortran-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc12-gdc-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /usr/share/info/gdc.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc13-gdc-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
gcc12-go-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package gcc11-go-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc11-go-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc12-go-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package gcc13-go-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc13-go-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc13-doc-13.2.1-alt4.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package gcc12-doc-12.3.1-alt1.noarch, but the package gcc12-doc-12.3.1-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc13-fortran-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package gcc12-fortran-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc12-fortran-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc13-gdc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 unmet-dependency-no-suitable-version fail install dependency libgdruntime13-devel has no suitable version.
gcc13-gdc-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /usr/share/info/gdc.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc12-gdc-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
gcc13-go-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 unmet-dependency-no-suitable-version fail install dependency libgo13-devel has no suitable version.
gcc13-go-doc-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package gcc12-go-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc12-go-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
img-build-0.2.1-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
libgccjit0-debuginfo-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 unmet-dependency-no-suitable-version fail install dependency libgccjit0 has no suitable version.
libgdb-devel-14.1.0.56.d739d4fd457-alt1.x86_64 library-pkgnames-static warn package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library
libgdruntime13-devel-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 unmet-dependency-no-suitable-version fail install dependency libgdruntime4 has no suitable version.
libgnat13-debuginfo-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 unmet-dependency-no-suitable-version fail install dependency libgnat13 has no suitable version.
libgphobos13-devel-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 unmet-dependency-no-suitable-version fail install dependency libgphobos4 has no suitable version.
libreadline5-devel-5.2.14-alt7.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package libreadline-devel-8.2.10-alt1.x86_64, for example, /usr/include/readline/chardefs.h (13 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
libreadline5-devel-5.2.14-alt7.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink warn value of symlink /usr/lib64/libhistory.so is different from the same symlink in the package libreadline-devel-8.2.10-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
libstdc++10-devel-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++11-devel-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++12-devel-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++13-devel-13.2.1-alt4.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
make-initrd-netboot-0.4.4-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
make-initrd-pipeline-stateless-0.3-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
mki-build-0.1.1-alt2.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
mutt-2.1.1.0.3.g6c0f75cca-alt1.1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
nitrokey-app-0.6.3-alt3.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop info desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/nitrokey-app.desktop: hint: value item "Security" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" can be extended with another category among the following categories: Settings, or System
nitrokey-app-0.6.3-alt3.x86_64 sisyphus_check fail sisyphus_check failed: /ALT/Sisyphus/files/x86_64/RPMS/nitrokey-app-0.6.3-alt3.x86_64.rpm: invalid udev rules path: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/40-nitrokey.rules sisyphus_check: check-udev ERROR: udev rules path violation
openssh-9.6p1-alt2.src specfile-useradd-n warn -n in useradd is compat option and can be removed any time. Use -N instead.
openssh-gostcrypto-9.6p1-alt2.gost.src specfile-useradd-n warn -n in useradd is compat option and can be removed any time. Use -N instead.
openssh-server-9.6p1-alt2.x86_64 init-lsb fail /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and sshd.service is not present. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
openssh-server-gostcrypto-9.6p1-alt2.gost.x86_64 init-lsb fail /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and sshd.service is not present. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
postfix-3.8.6-alt1.x86_64 init-lsb warn /etc/rc.d/init.d/postfix: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
qmapshack-1.17.1-alt1.1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
routino-doc-3.4.1-alt1.noarch big-changelog info Package contains big ChangeLog. Gzip it.
rpmrebuild-pesign-0.3.1-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
screen-4.8.0-alt2.x86_64 subdir-in-var-run info Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.
u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-alt2.x86_64 sisyphus_check fail sisyphus_check failed: /ALT/Sisyphus/files/x86_64/RPMS/u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-alt2.x86_64.rpm: invalid udev rules path: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-u2f-hidraw.rules sisyphus_check: check-udev ERROR: udev rules path violation
vim-X11-9.1.0050-alt4.noarch freedesktop-desktop info desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Text Editor" for key "Comment" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "???? ????" for key "Comment[ar]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[ar]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Texteditor" for key "Comment[de]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[de]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tekstredaktilo" for key "Comment[eo]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[eo]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tekstiredaktor" for key "Comment[et]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[et]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Testu Editorea" for key "Comment[eu]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[eu]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tekstieditori" for key "Comment[fi]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[fi]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "???? ????" for key "Comment[he]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[he]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Textaritill" for key "Comment[is]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[is]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "????????" for key "Comment[ja]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[ja]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Teksto redaktorius" for key "Comment[lt]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[lt]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Editur tat-test" for key "Comment[mt]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[mt]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Editor de Texto" for key "Comment[pt_BR]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[pt_BR]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Editor de text" for key "Comment[ro]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[ro]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Textov? editor" for key "Comment[sk]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[sk]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Urejevalnik besedil" for key "Comment[sl]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[sl]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Metin D?zenleyici" for key "Comment[tr]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[tr]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "???????? ???????" for key "Comment[uk]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[uk]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tr?nh so?n v?n b?n" for key "Comment[vi]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[vi]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "?????" for key "Comment[zh_CN]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[zh_CN]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "?????" for key "Comment[zh_TW]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[zh_TW]"
/usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "application/mathml+xml;application/xhtml+xml;application/x-perl;application/x-python;application/x-shellscript;audio/x-mpegurl;audio/x-scpls;image/svg+xml;message/news;message/rfc822;text/calendar;text/css;text/english;text/html;text/mrml;text/plain;text/rdf;text/rss;text/rtf;text/sgml;text/vnd.wap.wml;text/x-adasrc;text/x-bibtex;text/x-chdr;text/x-c++hdr;text/x-csrc;text/x-c++src;text/x-csv;text/x-diff;text/x-java;text/x-katefilelist;text/x-latex;text/x-log;text/x-lyx;text/x-makefile;text/xmcd;text/xml;text/x-moc;text/x-mswinurl;text/x-objcsrc;text/x-pascal;text/x-perl;text/x-python;text/x-tcl;text/x-tex;text/x-vcalendar;text/x-vcard;text/x-xslfo;text/x-xslt;" for key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" contains value "message/news" which is a MIME type that should probably not be used: "message" is a media type that probably does not make sense in this context
vim-common-9.1.0050-alt4.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-file warn symlink /usr/share/man/man1/ex.1.xz is a file in the package vi-traditional-4.1.3-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
vim-common-9.1.0050-alt4.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink warn value of symlink /usr/share/man/man1/view.1.xz is different from the same symlink in the package vi-traditional-4.1.3-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.

generated by repocop at Wed Oct 16 02:25:49 2024