Repocop reports for leader enp

  rpm id test Status message
alt-notes-server-lite-0.1-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn Files /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html /usr/share/alt-notes/release-notes.all.html /usr/share/alt-notes/release-notes.ru.html conflict with the package alt-notes-children-0.1-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package alt-notes-junior-0.2-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package alt-notes-junior-sj-0.2-alt4.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package alt-notes-junior-sm-0.2-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
fw-scripts-0.6-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
gdm-theme-altlinux-0.0-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
had-1.0.8-alt2.qa1.x86_64 checkbashisms experimental checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /etc/rc.d/init.d/had
had-1.0.8-alt2.qa1.x86_64 init-but-no-native-systemd info The package have SysV init script(s) but no native systemd files.
had-1.0.8-alt2.qa1.x86_64 init-lsb fail /etc/rc.d/init.d/had: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and had.service is not present. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
had-1.0.8-alt2.qa1.x86_64 missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
had-debuginfo-1.0.8-alt2.qa1.x86_64 missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
installer-server-lite-0.2-alt1.src beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 info warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/basesystem.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/kbd.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/license.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/lilo.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/network.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/root.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/time.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/user.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/vm.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_UA
/usr/share/alterator/steps/server-finish.desktop
installer-server-lite-0.2-alt1.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /usr/share/install2/help/ru_RU/license.html conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-5.0-alt23.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/help/ru_RU/license.html conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-8.1-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/help/ru_RU/license.html conflicts with the package installer-distro-lxdesktop-6.0-alt5.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/help/ru_RU/license.html conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/help/ru_RU/license.html conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/alterator-server.mo conflicts with the package installer-server-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
installer-server-lite-stage2-0.2-alt1.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-altlinux-desktop-stage2-8.1.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-altlinux-generic-stage2-7.0.3-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-altlinux-server-stage2-7.0.2-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-backup-server-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /usr/share/install2/installer-steps /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/01-remove-installer-server-pkgs.sh conflict with the package installer-distro-centaurus-stage2-8.2-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-chainmail-stage2-3.0.0-alt8.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt23.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-stage2-8.1-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-lxdesktop-stage2-6.0-alt5.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-office-server-stage2-5.0-alt28.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /usr/share/install2/installer-steps /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/01-remove-installer-server-pkgs.sh conflict with the package installer-distro-school-server-stage2-7.0-alt9.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /usr/share/install2/installer-steps /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/01-remove-installer-server-pkgs.sh conflict with the package installer-distro-server-light-stage2-8.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-simply-linux-stage2-8.3-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /usr/share/install2/installer-steps /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/01-remove-installer-server-pkgs.sh conflict with the package installer-distro-tablet-stage2-6.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-token-desktop-stage2-0.1.1-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-stage2-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /usr/share/install2/installer-steps /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/01-remove-installer-server-pkgs.sh conflict with the package installer-server-stage2-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
installer-server-lite-stage3-0.2-alt1.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /usr/share/alterator/ui/server/finish.scm conflicts with the package installer-server-stage3-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
java-service-0.1-alt2.1.noarch init-but-no-native-systemd info The package have SysV init script(s) but no native systemd files.
java-service-0.1-alt2.1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
live-hooks-tftp-20110406-alt1.noarch init-but-no-native-systemd info The package have SysV init script(s) but no native systemd files.
live-hooks-tftp-20110406-alt1.noarch init-lsb fail /etc/rc.d/init.d/live-hooks-tftp: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and live-hooks-tftp.service is not present. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
live-hooks-tftp-20110406-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
live-install-20160428-alt1.noarch checkbashisms experimental checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /usr/sbin/live-install
live-install-20160428-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
live-systemd-hooks-20160322-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
live-systemd-hooks-20160322-alt1.noarch systemd-but-no-native-init warn The package have native systemd file(s) but no SysV init scripts.
monetdb-client-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /usr/bin/mclient conflicts with the package maui-3.3-alt1.1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so info SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so but just /usr/lib64/libmapi.so.9.0.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmapi.so to \%files of monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstream.so but just /usr/lib64/libstream.so.8.2.3. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstream.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstream.so to \%files of monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink warn value of symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so is different from the same symlink in the package openchange-devel-2.4-alt22.zentyal23.S1.5.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
value of symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so is different from the same symlink in the package zarafa-devel-7.1.15-alt17.S1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so info SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libbat.so but just /usr/lib64/libbat.so.15.0.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libbat.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libbat.so to \%files of monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so but just /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so.23.0.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so to \%files of monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 init-but-no-native-systemd info The package have SysV init script(s) but no native systemd files.
monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 systemd-files-in-etc warn Systemd files Policy Draft violation: etc/tmpfiles.d/ is reserved for sysadmin overrides. Please, move /etc/tmpfiles.d/monetdbd.conf to \%_tmpfilesdir/.
netxms-agent-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so info SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libappagent.so but just /usr/lib64/libappagent.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libappagent.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libappagent.so to \%files of netxms-agent-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so to \%files of netxms-agent-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
netxms-agent-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 init-lsb warn /etc/rc.d/init.d/nxagentd: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
netxms-client-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so info SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so to \%files of netxms-client-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so info SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so but just /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxmap.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxmap.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxmap.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxmap.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so.5.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so info SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so.4.6.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsd.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsd.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsd.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsd.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so but just /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 init-lsb warn /etc/rc.d/init.d/netxmsd: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-TagHelpersExtra-0.1-alt1.src beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 info warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/perl5/Mojolicious/Plugin/README.pod
pictomir-0.16.2-alt2.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
prosody-0.9.10-alt3.x86_64 missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
prosody-0.9.10-alt3.x86_64 systemd-but-no-native-init warn The package have native systemd file(s) but no SysV init scripts.
prosody-debuginfo-0.9.10-alt3.x86_64 missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.
ser2net-2.5-alt1.qa1.x86_64 init-but-no-native-systemd info The package have SysV init script(s) but no native systemd files.
ser2net-2.5-alt1.qa1.x86_64 init-lsb fail /etc/rc.d/init.d/ser2net: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and ser2net.service is not present. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
xfce-settings-simple-1.0-alt6.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20170925-alt1.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.Xdefaults (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt3.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.Xdefaults (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.Xdefaults (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-junior-xfce-settings-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (8 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/skel/.Xdefaults conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-master-xfce-settings-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (8 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-server-xfce-settings-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (8 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-teacher-xfce-settings-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (8 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-8.2.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (9 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
xfwm4-theme-simple-0.1-alt1.noarch missing-url info Missing Url: in a package.

generated by repocop at Tue Feb 13 06:37:54 2018