Repocop reports for by-leader dans

  rpm id test status message
lxc-3.0.4-alt3.x86_64 checkbashisms experimental checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /usr/bin/lxc-checkconfig
lxc-3.0.4-alt3.x86_64 init-condrestart warn /etc/rc.d/init.d/lxc: missing condrestart target. Note: alt-specific script %_sbindir/post_service (used in %post_service macro) depends on condrestart. It is wise to add condrestart anyway./etc/rc.d/init.d/lxc: missing condstop target. Note: alt-specific script %_sbindir/preun_service (used in %preun_service macro) depends on condstop. It is wise to add condstop anyway./etc/rc.d/init.d/lxc-net: missing condrestart target. Note: alt-specific script %_sbindir/post_service (used in %post_service macro) depends on condrestart. It is wise to add condrestart anyway./etc/rc.d/init.d/lxc-net: missing condstop target. Note: alt-specific script %_sbindir/preun_service (used in %preun_service macro) depends on condstop. It is wise to add condstop anyway.
lxc-libs-3.0.4-alt3.x86_64 library-pkgnames info package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs
lxcfs-3.0.4-alt1.x86_64 init-lsb warn /etc/rc.d/init.d/lxcfs: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
lxd-3.18-alt1.x86_64 systemd-but-no-native-init warn The package have native systemd file(s) but no SysV init scripts.
osc-0.162.1-alt1.noarch sisyphus_check fail sisyphus_check failed: /ALT/Sisyphus/files/noarch/RPMS/osc-0.162.1-alt1.noarch.rpm: forbidden requires: /usr/bin/python sisyphus_check: check-deps ERROR: package dependencies violation
xmoto-0.5.11-alt3.r3421.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.

generated by repocop at Mon Feb 24 04:29:12 2020