Repocop reports by acl

	packager	rpm id	test	status	message
	respublica	coq-8.20.1-alt1.src	altlinux-policy-tex-rpm-build-texmf	warn	According to TeX policy (http://www.altlinux.org/TeXPolicy) packages that install files to /usr/share/texmf should BuildRequires(pre): rpm-build-texmf for the dependency magic to work.
	respublica	coq-coqide-8.20.1-alt1.x86_64	freedesktop-categories	warn	Menu-related Additional Categories (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) not found in /usr/share/applications/fr.inria.coqide.desktop. Please add it or report a bug against this test if you already have registered one (not including menu unrelated ones as Core or Qt).
	respublica	ghc9.0-common-9.0.2-alt2.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink	warn	value of symlink /usr/bin/runghc is different from the same symlink in the package ghc9.2-common-9.2.8-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. s.
	respublica	ghc9.0-debuginfo-9.0.2-alt2.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink	warn	value of symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a1/3111dcb881f354a874d336797bc96bb1837cf6.debug is different from the same symlink in the package ghc8.10.7-debuginfo-8.10.7-alt6.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	respublica	ghc9.0-doc-9.0.2-alt2.x86_64	arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share	info	The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
	respublica	ghc9.2-common-9.2.8-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink	warn	value of symlink /usr/bin/runghc is different from the same symlink in the package ghc9.0-common-9.0.2-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. s.
	respublica	ghc9.2-doc-9.2.8-alt1.x86_64	arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share	info	The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
	respublica	libnetgen-6.2.2406-alt3.x86_64	altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so	info	SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnglib.so but just /usr/lib64/libnglib.so.6.2.2406.6.2.2406.6.2.2406-6.2.2406-6.2.2406. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnglib.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnglib.so to \%files of libnetgen-6.2.2406-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. st.
	respublica	mediamtx-1.11.3-alt1.x86_64	systemd-but-no-native-init	experimental	The package have native systemd file(s) but no SysV init scripts.