| |
packager |
rpm id |
test |
Status |
message |
 |
enp |
alt-notes-server-lite-0.1-alt1.noarch |
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file |
warn |
Files /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html /usr/share/alt-notes/release-notes.all.html /usr/share/alt-notes/release-notes.ru.html conflict with the package alt-notes-children-0.1-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package alt-notes-junior-0.2-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package alt-notes-junior-sj-0.2-alt4.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package alt-notes-junior-sm-0.2-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. |
 |
enp |
fw-scripts-0.6-alt1.noarch |
missing-url |
info |
Missing Url: in a package. |
|
enp |
gdm-theme-altlinux-0.0-alt1.noarch |
missing-url |
info |
Missing Url: in a package. |
 |
enp |
had-1.0.8-alt2.qa1.x86_64 |
checkbashisms |
experimental |
checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /etc/rc.d/init.d/had |
|
enp |
had-1.0.8-alt2.qa1.x86_64 |
init-but-no-native-systemd |
info |
The package have SysV init script(s) but no native systemd files. |
 |
enp |
had-1.0.8-alt2.qa1.x86_64 |
init-lsb |
fail |
/etc/rc.d/init.d/had: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and had.service is not present. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details. |
|
enp |
had-1.0.8-alt2.qa1.x86_64 |
missing-url |
info |
Missing Url: in a package. |
|
enp |
had-debuginfo-1.0.8-alt2.qa1.x86_64 |
missing-url |
info |
Missing Url: in a package. |
|
enp |
installer-server-lite-0.2-alt1.src |
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 |
info |
warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/basesystem.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/kbd.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/license.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/lilo.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/network.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/root.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/time.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/user.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_RU/vm.html
/usr/share/alterator/help/ru_UA
/usr/share/alterator/steps/server-finish.desktop |
|
enp |
installer-server-lite-0.2-alt1.x86_64 |
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file |
warn |
File /usr/share/install2/help/ru_RU/license.html conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-5.0-alt23.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/help/ru_RU/license.html conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-8.1-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/help/ru_RU/license.html conflicts with the package installer-distro-lxdesktop-6.0-alt5.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/help/ru_RU/license.html conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/help/ru_RU/license.html conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/alterator-server.mo conflicts with the package installer-server-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. |
|
enp |
installer-server-lite-stage2-0.2-alt1.x86_64 |
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file |
warn |
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-altlinux-desktop-stage2-8.1.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-altlinux-generic-stage2-7.0.3-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-altlinux-server-stage2-7.0.2-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-backup-server-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /usr/share/install2/installer-steps /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/01-remove-installer-server-pkgs.sh conflict with the package installer-distro-centaurus-stage2-8.2-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-chainmail-stage2-3.0.0-alt8.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt23.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-junior-stage2-8.1-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-lxdesktop-stage2-6.0-alt5.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-office-server-stage2-5.0-alt28.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /usr/share/install2/installer-steps /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/01-remove-installer-server-pkgs.sh conflict with the package installer-distro-school-server-stage2-7.0-alt9.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /usr/share/install2/installer-steps /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/01-remove-installer-server-pkgs.sh conflict with the package installer-distro-server-light-stage2-8.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-simply-linux-stage2-8.3-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /usr/share/install2/installer-steps /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/01-remove-installer-server-pkgs.sh conflict with the package installer-distro-tablet-stage2-6.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-token-desktop-stage2-0.1.1-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-distro-workbench-stage2-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /usr/share/install2/installer-steps conflicts with the package installer-office-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /usr/share/install2/installer-steps /usr/share/install2/postinstall.d/01-remove-installer-server-pkgs.sh conflict with the package installer-server-stage2-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. |
|
enp |
installer-server-lite-stage3-0.2-alt1.x86_64 |
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file |
warn |
File /usr/share/alterator/ui/server/finish.scm conflicts with the package installer-server-stage3-0.2-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. |
|
enp |
java-service-0.1-alt2.1.noarch |
init-but-no-native-systemd |
info |
The package have SysV init script(s) but no native systemd files. |
|
enp |
java-service-0.1-alt2.1.noarch |
missing-url |
info |
Missing Url: in a package. |
|
enp |
live-hooks-tftp-20110406-alt1.noarch |
init-but-no-native-systemd |
info |
The package have SysV init script(s) but no native systemd files. |
|
enp |
live-hooks-tftp-20110406-alt1.noarch |
init-lsb |
fail |
/etc/rc.d/init.d/live-hooks-tftp: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and live-hooks-tftp.service is not present. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details. |
|
enp |
live-hooks-tftp-20110406-alt1.noarch |
missing-url |
info |
Missing Url: in a package. |
|
enp |
live-install-20180306-alt1.noarch |
missing-url |
info |
Missing Url: in a package. |
|
enp |
live-systemd-hooks-20160322-alt1.noarch |
missing-url |
info |
Missing Url: in a package. |
|
enp |
live-systemd-hooks-20160322-alt1.noarch |
systemd-but-no-native-init |
warn |
The package have native systemd file(s) but no SysV init scripts. |
|
enp |
monetdb-client-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 |
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file |
warn |
File /usr/bin/mclient conflicts with the package maui-3.3-alt1.1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. |
|
enp |
monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 |
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so |
info |
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so but just /usr/lib64/libmapi.so.9.0.2. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmapi.so to \%files of monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstream.so but just /usr/lib64/libstream.so.8.2.3. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstream.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstream.so to \%files of monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. |
|
enp |
monetdb-common-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 |
rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink |
warn |
value of symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so is different from the same symlink in the package openchange-devel-2.4-alt24.zentyal23.S1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
value of symlink /usr/lib64/libmapi.so is different from the same symlink in the package zarafa-devel-7.1.15-alt19.S1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. |
|
enp |
monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 |
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so |
info |
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libbat.so but just /usr/lib64/libbat.so.15.0.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libbat.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libbat.so to \%files of monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so but just /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so.23.0.5. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libmonetdb5.so to \%files of monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. |
|
enp |
monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 |
init-but-no-native-systemd |
info |
The package have SysV init script(s) but no native systemd files. |
|
enp |
monetdb-server-11.27.11-alt1.1.x86_64 |
systemd-files-in-etc |
warn |
Systemd files Policy Draft violation: etc/tmpfiles.d/ is reserved for sysadmin overrides. Please, move /etc/tmpfiles.d/monetdbd.conf to \%_tmpfilesdir/. |
|
enp |
netxms-agent-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 |
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so |
info |
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libappagent.so but just /usr/lib64/libappagent.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libappagent.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libappagent.so to \%files of netxms-agent-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxagent.so to \%files of netxms-agent-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. |
|
enp |
netxms-agent-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 |
init-lsb |
warn |
/etc/rc.d/init.d/nxagentd: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details. |
|
enp |
netxms-client-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 |
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so |
info |
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxclient.so to \%files of netxms-client-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. |
|
enp |
netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 |
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so |
info |
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so but just /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnetxms.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxdb.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxlp.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxmap.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxmap.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxmap.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxmap.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsnmp.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so.5.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxtre.so to \%files of netxms-common-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. |
|
enp |
netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 |
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so |
info |
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxcc.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxcore.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so.4.6.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxjansson.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsd.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsd.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsd.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsd.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsl.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so but just /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libnxsrv.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so but just /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so.2.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libstrophe.so to \%files of netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. |
|
enp |
netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 |
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share |
info |
The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere. |
|
enp |
netxms-server-2.0.8-alt3.x86_64 |
init-lsb |
warn |
/etc/rc.d/init.d/netxmsd: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details. |
|
enp |
perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-TagHelpersExtra-0.1-alt1.src |
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 |
info |
warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/perl5/Mojolicious/Plugin/README.pod |
|
enp |
pictomir-0.16.2-alt2.x86_64 |
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share |
info |
The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere. |
|
enp |
prosody-0.9.10-alt3.x86_64 |
missing-url |
info |
Missing Url: in a package. |
|
enp |
prosody-0.9.10-alt3.x86_64 |
systemd-but-no-native-init |
warn |
The package have native systemd file(s) but no SysV init scripts. |
|
enp |
prosody-debuginfo-0.9.10-alt3.x86_64 |
missing-url |
info |
Missing Url: in a package. |
|
enp |
ser2net-2.5-alt1.qa1.x86_64 |
init-but-no-native-systemd |
info |
The package have SysV init script(s) but no native systemd files. |
|
enp |
ser2net-2.5-alt1.qa1.x86_64 |
init-lsb |
fail |
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser2net: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and ser2net.service is not present. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details. |
|
enp |
xfce-settings-simple-1.0-alt6.noarch |
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file |
warn |
There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20170925-alt1.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.Xdefaults (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt3.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.Xdefaults (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.Xdefaults (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-junior-xfce-settings-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (8 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/skel/.Xdefaults conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-master-xfce-settings-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (8 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-server-xfce-settings-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (8 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-teacher-xfce-settings-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (8 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-8.2.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (9 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. |
|
enp |
xfwm4-theme-simple-0.1-alt1.noarch |
missing-url |
info |
Missing Url: in a package. |
|
mithraen |
nginx-1.12.1-alt2.S1.1.x86_64 |
init-lsb |
warn |
/etc/rc.d/init.d/nginx: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details. |
|
mithraen |
nginx-1.12.1-alt2.S1.1.x86_64 |
subdir-in-var-run |
info |
Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them. |