Repocop reports by acl

  packager rpm id test status message
azol AlephOne-1.0.1-alt1.2.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop info desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/AlephOne.desktop: warning: value "First person shooter game" for key "Comment" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "First person shooter game" of key "GenericName"
/usr/share/applications/AlephOne.desktop: warning: value "3D-????????? ?? ??????? ????" for key "Comment[ru]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "3D-????????? ?? ??????? ????" of key "GenericName[ru]"
azol alt-docs-apache2-0.2.1-alt1.noarch altlinux-policy-obsolete-httpd2-reload info This package contains httpd2 restart/reload calls in its post/un scripts. But those calls are deprecated by httpd2.filetrigger that activates by files in /etc/httpd2/ or %_libdir/apache2/modules/. It should be safe to remove those calls and rely on the filetrigger instead.
azol alt-notes-school-server-4.1-alt3.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-master-notes-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-teacher-notes-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
azol alt-notes-school-server-4.1-alt3.noarch rpm-package-is-obsoleted warn The package is obsoleted by the package branding-school-server-notes-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of branding-school-server-notes-7.0.5-alt2.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.
azol asciidoc-8.6.9-alt1.1.src altlinux-policy-tex-rpm-build-texmf warn According to TeX policy (http://www.altlinux.org/TeXPolicy) packages that install files to /usr/share/texmf should BuildRequires(pre): rpm-build-texmf for the dependency magic to work.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-desktop-5.9.9-alt3.src beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-i586 info warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/etc/gnome/xdg/menus/applications-merged/applications.menu
/etc/xdg/menus/settings.menu
boyarsh branding-altlinux-desktop-5.9.9-alt3.src beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 info warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/etc/gnome/xdg/menus/applications-merged/applications.menu
/etc/xdg/menus/settings.menu
boyarsh branding-altlinux-desktop-5.9.9-alt3.src requires-ImageMagick info Dependency on ImageMagick (compat package) found. It probably should be replaced with more specific dependency like /usr/bin/convert or ImageMagick-tools, or it can be already autodetected by findreq-shell.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-desktop-alterator-5.9.9-alt3.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-sisyphus-alterator-20170925-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alterator/design/images/close-dialog-button.png (7 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt3.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lxdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-7.0.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-tablet-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-informika-schoolmaster-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt47.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-ivk-chainmail-indexhtml-3.0-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-8.2.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-desktop-kde4-settings-5.9.9-alt3.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /etc/kde4/xdg/menus/applications-merged/desktop.menu conflicts with the package branding-alt-sisyphus-kde4-settings-20170925-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-desktop-notes-5.9.9-alt3.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-sisyphus-notes-20170925-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/index-en.html (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-desktop-release-5.9.9-alt3.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package altlinux-release-icarus-20160328-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p8-20160414-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt3.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn Files /usr/share/xfce4/backdrops/default.png /usr/share/xfce4/backdrops/xdm.png conflict with the package branding-alt-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20170925-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-11888137035.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-office-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/panels.xml /etc/skel/.local/share/applications/defaults.list /usr/share/xfce4/backdrops/xdm.png conflict with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-10.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-network-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-11888137035.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-office-lite-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt3.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-lite-5.9.9-alt1.src requires-ImageMagick info Dependency on ImageMagick (compat package) found. It probably should be replaced with more specific dependency like /usr/bin/convert or ImageMagick-tools, or it can be already autodetected by findreq-shell.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lxdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-7.0.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-tablet-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-informika-schoolmaster-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt47.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-ivk-chainmail-indexhtml-3.0-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-8.2.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-lite-release-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package altlinux-release-icarus-20160328-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p8-20160414-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-11888137035.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-office-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
Files /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/panels.xml /etc/skel/.local/share/applications/defaults.list /usr/share/xfce4/backdrops/xdm.png conflict with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-10.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-network-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-11888137035.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-office-lite-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
boyarsh branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
lav bibletime-2.11.2-alt1.x86_64 arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share info The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
lav bibletime-2.11.2-alt1.x86_64 freedesktop-desktop info desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/bibletime.desktop: hint: value item "Dictionary" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" can be extended with another category among the following categories: Office, or TextTools
mike fetchmail-daemon-6.3.26-alt4.qa1.noarch init-lsb warn /etc/rc.d/init.d/fetchmail: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
mike fetchmail-daemon-6.3.26-alt4.qa1.noarch subdir-in-var-run info Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.
mike fetchmailconf-6.3.26-alt4.qa1.noarch freedesktop-categories warn Menu-related Additional Categories (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) not found in /usr/share/applications/fetchmailconf.desktop. Please add it or report a bug against this test if you already have registered one (not including menu unrelated ones as Core or Qt).
nbr libpst-0.6.68-alt2.1.src beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-i586 info warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/_libpst.la
nbr libpst-0.6.68-alt2.1.src beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 info warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_libpst.la
sem branding-simply-linux-8.2.0-alt1.src requires-ImageMagick info Dependency on ImageMagick (compat package) found. It probably should be replaced with more specific dependency like /usr/bin/convert or ImageMagick-tools, or it can be already autodetected by findreq-shell.
sem branding-simply-linux-alterator-8.2.0-alt1.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, but the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
sem branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-8.2.0-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (12 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lxdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-7.0.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-tablet-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-informika-schoolmaster-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt47.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-ivk-chainmail-indexhtml-3.0-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-xalt-kworkstation-indexhtml-8.2.0-alt3.S1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (12 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
sem branding-simply-linux-menu-8.2.0-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-junior-menu-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-master-menu-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-server-menu-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-teacher-menu-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
sem branding-simply-linux-notes-8.2.0-alt1.noarch file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile warn Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since
/usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system
administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration
file.
sem branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-8.2.0-alt1.noarch rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file warn File /etc/skel/.gtkrc-2.0 conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-graphics-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/skel/.gtkrc-2.0 conflicts with the package branding-xalt-kworkstation-graphics-8.2.0-alt3.S1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/helpers.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
sem branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-8.2.0-alt1.noarch rpm-obsolete-live-package info The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.

generated by repocop at Tue Oct 23 05:36:23 2018