Repocop reports by acl

	packager	rpm id	test	Status	message
	azol	AlephOne-1.0.1-alt1.2.x86_64	freedesktop-desktop	info	desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/AlephOne.desktop: warning: value "First person shooter game" for key "Comment" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "First person shooter game" of key "GenericName" /usr/share/applications/AlephOne.desktop: warning: value "3D-????????? ?? ??????? ????" for key "Comment[ru]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "3D-????????? ?? ??????? ????" of key "GenericName[ru]"
	azol	alt-docs-apache2-0.2.1-alt1.noarch	altlinux-policy-obsolete-httpd2-reload	info	This package contains httpd2 restart/reload calls in its post/un scripts. But those calls are deprecated by httpd2.filetrigger that activates by files in /etc/httpd2/ or %_libdir/apache2/modules/. It should be safe to remove those calls and rely on the filetrigger instead.
	azol	alt-notes-school-server-4.1-alt3.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-master-notes-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-teacher-notes-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/license.all.html (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	azol	alt-notes-school-server-4.1-alt3.noarch	rpm-package-is-obsoleted	warn	The package is obsoleted by the package branding-school-server-notes-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of branding-school-server-notes-7.0.5-alt2.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.
	azol	asciidoc-8.6.9-alt1.1.src	altlinux-policy-tex-rpm-build-texmf	warn	According to TeX policy (http://www.altlinux.org/TeXPolicy) packages that install files to /usr/share/texmf should BuildRequires(pre): rpm-build-texmf for the dependency magic to work.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-desktop-5.9.9-alt3.src	beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64	info	warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/gnome/xdg/menus/applications-merged/applications.menu /etc/xdg/menus/settings.menu
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-desktop-5.9.9-alt3.src	requires-ImageMagick	info	Dependency on ImageMagick (compat package) found. It probably should be replaced with more specific dependency like /usr/bin/convert or ImageMagick-tools, or it can be already autodetected by findreq-shell.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-desktop-alterator-5.9.9-alt3.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-sisyphus-alterator-20170925-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alterator/design/images/close-dialog-button.png (7 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt3.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lxdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-7.0.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-tablet-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-informika-schoolmaster-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt47.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-ivk-chainmail-indexhtml-3.0-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-8.2.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-sisyphus-server-light-indexhtml-1.9.3-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-desktop-kde4-settings-5.9.9-alt3.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /etc/kde4/xdg/menus/applications-merged/desktop.menu conflicts with the package branding-alt-sisyphus-kde4-settings-20170925-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-desktop-notes-5.9.9-alt3.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package branding-alt-sisyphus-notes-20170925-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/alt-notes/index-en.html (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-desktop-release-5.9.9-alt3.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package altlinux-release-icarus-20160328-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p8-20160414-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt3.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	Files /usr/share/xfce4/backdrops/default.png /usr/share/xfce4/backdrops/xdm.png conflict with the package branding-alt-sisyphus-xfce-settings-20170925-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-11888137035.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-office-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. Files /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/panels.xml /etc/skel/.local/share/applications/defaults.list /usr/share/xfce4/backdrops/xdm.png conflict with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-10.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-network-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-11888137035.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-office-lite-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-simple-1.0-alt6.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.Xdefaults (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-desktop-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt3.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-lite-5.9.9-alt1.src	requires-ImageMagick	info	Dependency on ImageMagick (compat package) found. It probably should be replaced with more specific dependency like /usr/bin/convert or ImageMagick-tools, or it can be already autodetected by findreq-shell.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lxdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-7.0.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-tablet-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-informika-schoolmaster-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt47.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-ivk-chainmail-indexhtml-3.0-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-8.2.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-sisyphus-server-light-indexhtml-1.9.3-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-lite-release-5.9.9-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package altlinux-release-icarus-20160328-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package altlinux-release-p8-20160414-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-11888137035.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-office-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. Files /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/panels.xml /etc/skel/.local/share/applications/defaults.list /usr/share/xfce4/backdrops/xdm.png conflict with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-10.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-network-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/panel/launcher-11888137035.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-office-lite-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-simple-1.0-alt6.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.Xdefaults (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	boyarsh	branding-altlinux-lite-xfce-settings-5.9.9-alt1.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
	lav	bibletime-2.10.1-alt3.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
	lav	bibletime-2.10.1-alt3.x86_64	freedesktop-desktop	info	desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/bibletime.desktop: hint: value item "Dictionary" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" can be extended with another category among the following categories: Office, or TextTools
	mike	fetchmail-6.3.26-alt4.src	altlinux-python-obsolete-buildreq-python-dev	warn	python-dev is obsolete according to Python Policy (http://www.altlinux.org/Python_Policy). Please, use BuildRequires: python-devel.
	mike	fetchmail-daemon-6.3.26-alt4.noarch	init-lsb	warn	/etc/rc.d/init.d/fetchmail: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
	mike	fetchmail-daemon-6.3.26-alt4.noarch	subdir-in-var-run	info	Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.
	mike	fetchmailconf-6.3.26-alt4.noarch	freedesktop-categories	warn	Menu-related Additional Categories (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) not found in /usr/share/applications/fetchmailconf.desktop. Please add it or report a bug against this test if you already have registered one (not including menu unrelated ones as Core or Qt).
	sem	branding-simply-linux-8.2.0-alt1.src	requires-ImageMagick	info	Dependency on ImageMagick (compat package) found. It probably should be replaced with more specific dependency like /usr/bin/convert or ImageMagick-tools, or it can be already autodetected by findreq-shell.
	sem	branding-simply-linux-alterator-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, but the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-alterator-6.0.0-alt3.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
	sem	branding-simply-linux-indexhtml-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-indexhtml-7.0.5-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-indexhtml-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (12 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-lxdesktop-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt7.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-office-server-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-spt-indexhtml-7.0.0-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-tablet-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt3.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-informika-schoolmaster-indexhtml-6.0.0-alt47.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (11 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-ivk-chainmail-indexhtml-3.0-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-lite-indexhtml-5.9.9-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-sisyphus-server-light-indexhtml-1.9.3-alt1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (4 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-xalt-kworkstation-indexhtml-8.2.0-alt3.S1.noarch, for example, /usr/share/applications/indexhtml.desktop (12 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	sem	branding-simply-linux-menu-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-junior-menu-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-master-menu-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-server-menu-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package branding-school-teacher-menu-7.0.5-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/slinux-style/applications/Ri-li.desktop (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	sem	branding-simply-linux-notes-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile	warn	Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
	sem	branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /etc/skel/.gtkrc-2.0 conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-kdesktop-graphics-8.0.0-alt0.6.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/skel/.gtkrc-2.0 conflicts with the package branding-xalt-kworkstation-graphics-8.2.0-alt3.S1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/helpers.rc conflicts with the package xfce-settings-lite-school-0.6-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. There are file conflicts with the package xfce-settings-simple-1.0-alt6.noarch, for example, /etc/skel/.config/xfce4/Xcursor.xrdb (9 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
	sem	branding-simply-linux-xfce-settings-8.2.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch, but the package xfce-settings-lite-1.0-alt7.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.