alt-gpgkeys-0.8.122-alt1.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
alt-gpgkeys-utils-0.8.122-alt1.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
alt-rpmkeys-0.8.122-alt1.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
alt-rpmkeys-utils-0.8.122-alt1.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
altlinux-repos-11.0-alt3.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
apt-conf-branch-11.0-alt1.x86_64	rpm-package-is-obsoleted	warn	The package is  obsoleted by the package apt-conf-sisyphus-10.96-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of apt-conf-sisyphus-10.96-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.; 
apt-conf-sisyphus-10.96-alt2.x86_64	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package apt-conf-branch-11.0-alt1.x86_64, but the package apt-conf-branch-11.0-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
apt-repo-tools-0.8.1-alt1.x86_64	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
apt-repo-tools-debuginfo-0.8.1-alt1.x86_64	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
apt-scripts-0.1.5-alt1.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
aptitude-0.4.5-alt16.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
aptitude-doc-0.4.5-alt16.x86_64	arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share	info	The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
arepoize-0.1-alt1.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
binutils-2.43-alt1.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
binutils-2.43-alt1.x86_64	library-pkgnames	info	package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs; 
binutils-devel-2.43-alt1.x86_64	library-pkgnames-static	warn	package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library; 
fb2edit-0.1.0-alt1.x86_64	freedesktop-desktop	info	desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/fb2edit.desktop: hint: value "Office;FileTools;Qt;Viewer;TextTools;TextEditor;Utility;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains more than one main category; application might appear more than once in the application menu; 
gcc10-doc-10.5.0-alt1.noarch	rpm-package-is-obsoleted	warn	The package is  obsoleted by the package gcc14-doc-14.3.1-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc14-doc-14.3.1-alt2.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; 
gcc10-fortran-doc-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64	rpm-package-is-obsoleted	warn	The package is  obsoleted by the package gcc14-fortran-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc14-fortran-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.; 
gcc10-gdc-doc-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /usr/share/info/gdc.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc14-gdc-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
gcc10-go-doc-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64	rpm-package-is-obsoleted	warn	The package is  obsoleted by the package gcc14-go-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc14-go-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.; 
gcc12-doc-12.3.1-alt1.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package gcc11-doc-11.4.1-alt1.noarch, but the package gcc11-doc-11.4.1-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
gcc12-doc-12.3.1-alt1.noarch	rpm-package-is-obsoleted	warn	The package is  obsoleted by the package gcc14-doc-14.3.1-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc14-doc-14.3.1-alt2.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.; 
gcc12-fortran-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package gcc11-fortran-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc11-fortran-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
gcc12-fortran-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64	rpm-package-is-obsoleted	warn	The package is  obsoleted by the package gcc14-fortran-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc14-fortran-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.; 
gcc12-gdc-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /usr/share/info/gdc.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc14-gdc-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
gcc12-go-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package gcc11-go-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc11-go-doc-11.4.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
gcc12-go-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64	rpm-package-is-obsoleted	warn	The package is  obsoleted by the package gcc14-go-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc14-go-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.; 
gcc13-doc-13.2.1-alt5.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package gcc14-doc-14.3.1-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/info/cpp.info.xz (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
gcc13-doc-13.2.1-alt5.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package gcc12-doc-12.3.1-alt1.noarch, but the package gcc12-doc-12.3.1-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
gcc13-fortran-doc-13.2.1-alt5.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /usr/share/info/gfortran.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc14-fortran-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
gcc13-fortran-doc-13.2.1-alt5.x86_64	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package gcc12-fortran-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc12-fortran-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
gcc13-gdc-doc-13.2.1-alt5.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /usr/share/info/gdc.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc14-gdc-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
gcc13-go-doc-13.2.1-alt5.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /usr/share/info/gccgo.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc14-go-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
gcc13-go-doc-13.2.1-alt5.x86_64	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package gcc12-go-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc12-go-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
gcc14-doc-14.3.1-alt2.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package gcc13-doc-13.2.1-alt5.noarch, for example, /usr/share/info/cpp.info.xz (5 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
gcc14-doc-14.3.1-alt2.noarch	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package gcc12-doc-12.3.1-alt1.noarch, but the package gcc12-doc-12.3.1-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
gcc14-fortran-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /usr/share/info/gfortran.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc13-fortran-doc-13.2.1-alt5.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
gcc14-fortran-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package gcc12-fortran-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc12-fortran-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
gcc14-gdc-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /usr/share/info/gdc.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc13-gdc-doc-13.2.1-alt5.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
gcc14-go-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	File /usr/share/info/gccgo.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc13-go-doc-13.2.1-alt5.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
gcc14-go-doc-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64	rpm-obsolete-live-package	info	The package obsoletes the package gcc12-go-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc12-go-doc-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.; 
glibc-gconv-modules-2.40.0.142.2eb180-alt1.x86_64	file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile	warn	Files below <tt>/usr</tt> may not be marked as conffiles, since;  <tt>/usr</tt> might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system;  administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration;  file.; ; 
glibc-locales-2.40.0.142.2eb180-alt1.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
img-build-0.2.2-alt1.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
libgdb-devel-14.1.0.56.d739d4fd457-alt1.x86_64	library-pkgnames-static	warn	package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library; 
libreadline5-devel-5.2.14-alt7.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file	warn	There are file conflicts with the package libreadline-devel-8.2.10-alt1.x86_64, for example, /usr/include/readline/chardefs.h (13 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
libreadline5-devel-5.2.14-alt7.x86_64	rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink	warn	value of symlink /usr/lib64/libhistory.so is different from the same symlink in the package libreadline-devel-8.2.10-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
libstdc++10-devel-10.5.0-alt1.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
libstdc++12-devel-12.3.1-alt1.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
libstdc++13-devel-13.2.1-alt5.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
libstdc++14-devel-14.3.1-alt2.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
make-initrd-netboot-0.5-alt1.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
make-initrd-pipeline-stateless-0.3-alt1.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
mki-build-0.1.1-alt2.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
mutt-2.1.1.0.3.g6c0f75cca-alt1.1.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
nitrokey-app-1.4.2-alt2.x86_64	freedesktop-desktop	info	desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/nitrokey-app.desktop: hint: value item "Security" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" can be extended with another category among the following categories: Settings, or System; 
nscd-2.40.0.142.2eb180-alt1.x86_64	init-lsb	fail	/etc/rc.d/init.d/nscd: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and nscd.service is not present.  See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; 
nscd-2.40.0.142.2eb180-alt1.x86_64	subdir-in-var-run	info	Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.; 
openssh-9.6p1-alt5.src	specfile-useradd-n	warn	 -n in useradd is compat option and can be removed any time. Use -N instead.; 
openssh-gostcrypto-9.6p1-alt3.gost.src	specfile-useradd-n	warn	 -n in useradd is compat option and can be removed any time. Use -N instead.; 
openssh-server-9.6p1-alt5.x86_64	init-lsb	fail	/etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and sshd.service is not present.  See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; 
openssh-server-gostcrypto-9.6p1-alt3.gost.x86_64	init-lsb	fail	/etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and sshd.service is not present.  See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.; 
openssl-config-3.2.0-alt1.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
qmapshack-1.17.1-alt1.1.x86_64	arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share	info	The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.; 
routino-doc-3.4.1-alt1.noarch	big-changelog	info	Package contains big ChangeLog. Gzip it.; 
rpmrebuild-pesign-0.4.0-alt1.noarch	missing-url	info	Missing Url: in a package.; 
u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-alt2.x86_64	sisyphus_check	fail	sisyphus_check failed:  /ALT/Sisyphus/files/x86_64/RPMS/u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-alt2.x86_64.rpm: invalid udev rules path: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-u2f-hidraw.rules sisyphus_check: check-udev ERROR: udev rules path violation; 
vim-X11-9.1.1264-alt1.noarch	freedesktop-desktop	info	desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Text Editor" for key "Comment" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "???? ????" for key "Comment[ar]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[ar]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Texteditor" for key "Comment[de]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[de]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tekstredaktilo" for key "Comment[eo]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[eo]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tekstiredaktor" for key "Comment[et]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[et]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Testu Editorea" for key "Comment[eu]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[eu]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tekstieditori" for key "Comment[fi]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[fi]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "???? ????" for key "Comment[he]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[he]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Textaritill" for key "Comment[is]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[is]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "????????" for key "Comment[ja]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[ja]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Teksto redaktorius" for key "Comment[lt]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[lt]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Editur tat-test" for key "Comment[mt]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[mt]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Editor de Texto" for key "Comment[pt_BR]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[pt_BR]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Editor de text" for key "Comment[ro]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[ro]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Textov? editor" for key "Comment[sk]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[sk]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Urejevalnik besedil" for key "Comment[sl]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[sl]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Metin D?zenleyici" for key "Comment[tr]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[tr]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "???????? ???????" for key "Comment[uk]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[uk]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tr?nh so?n v?n b?n" for key "Comment[vi]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[vi]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "?????" for key "Comment[zh_CN]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[zh_CN]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "?????" for key "Comment[zh_TW]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[zh_TW]"; /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "application/mathml+xml;application/xhtml+xml;application/x-perl;application/x-python;application/x-shellscript;audio/x-mpegurl;audio/x-scpls;image/svg+xml;message/news;message/rfc822;text/calendar;text/css;text/english;text/html;text/mrml;text/plain;text/rdf;text/rss;text/rtf;text/sgml;text/vnd.wap.wml;text/x-adasrc;text/x-bibtex;text/x-chdr;text/x-c++hdr;text/x-csrc;text/x-c++src;text/x-csv;text/x-diff;text/x-java;text/x-katefilelist;text/x-latex;text/x-log;text/x-lyx;text/x-makefile;text/xmcd;text/xml;text/x-moc;text/x-mswinurl;text/x-objcsrc;text/x-pascal;text/x-perl;text/x-python;text/x-tcl;text/x-tex;text/x-vcalendar;text/x-vcard;text/x-xslfo;text/x-xslt;" for key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" contains value "message/news" which is a MIME type that should probably not be used: "message" is a media type that probably does not make sense in this context; 
vim-common-9.1.1264-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-file	warn	symlink /usr/share/man/man1/ex.1.xz is a file in the package vi-traditional-4.1.3-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
vim-common-9.1.1264-alt1.noarch	rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink	warn	value of symlink /usr/share/man/man1/view.1.xz is different from the same symlink in the package vi-traditional-4.1.3-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.; 
